To Patients

Articles

Dentists

Dental Clinics

Prepaid Dentistry

Radiological Centers

Clinical Laboratories

Dentistry Consultation

   

To Dentists

Articles

Clinical Cases

Dental Societies

Magazines

Dental Deposits

   

Our Site

How Announced

Annual Visits

Use Policy

Contact Us

 

 

 

Articles for dentists

 

Total toothless overdentures in patients with osseointegrated implants using Hader bar system.

 

Dr. Juan Carlos Rueda Sánchez

Osseointegrated Implantology Specialist, Universidad Andrés Bello, Chile
Diplome Osseointegrated Implantology, Loma Linda University, USA
Principal Lecturer in Osseointegrated Implantology, IN.CA.FOE Guayas
www.implantesdentales.com.ec
info@implantesdentales.com.ec

 

Abstract

There are different treatments for patients toothless totals. An excellent alternative to low-cost rehabilitation and are highly predictable overdentures on dental implants, providing comfort, stability, and improve self-esteem of our patients compared to a conventional complete removable dentures.

 

Advertising

Summary
 

There are different treatments for the total toothless patients. An excellent rehabilitation alternative at low cost and with high predictability is an overdenture on dental implants, what will offer comfort, stability and  will be able to increase the self-esteem of our patients in front of a conventional total removable prosthesis.

 

Introduction

Patient rehabilitation toothless constituting a major challenge for the dental rehabilitation. With the advance of science and technology, we see that every day new techniques are developed that seek to restore the masticatory function, aesthetics and comfort, as best as possible.

A large number of removable denture wearers totals show dissatisfaction with their treatment and seek a solution to their problems functional, psychological and aesthetic. We, as specialists in oral rehabilitation, we must be very pressing in the evaluation of these patients from the outset that we consult. We must give us the necessary time to conduct a full review. How to walk, talk, postural position, general health status, previous dental experiences, concerns, etc.. Are not minor details, which will provide important background to solve a future rehabilitation treatment.

 

Subsequent to this, a complete extra-and intraoral examination, supported by complementary examinations (articulated study models, radiographs, CT, etc..), Will allow us to obtain a correct diagnosis and determine a treatment plan is best possible, achieving satisfactory results for patient and professional.

Currently, one of the best solutions we can give our total patient toothless, is the prosthetic rehabilitation on osseointegrated implants. (3) Within these prostheses, overdentures supported by implants through a bar ignition system (Hader) are a good alternative.

Overdenture A removable prosthesis is a partial or total coating characterized by fibromucosa and roots, teeth or implants prepared for this purpose. (1)

 

The main indications for overdentures are:
Economics: It is generally recommended two implants in lower jaw and four in the top. By using fewer implants prices are diminished and are more accessible to patients.
Anatomical: If we need to provide support for facial, where there is a marked atrophy of the alveolar.


Aesthetics: In comparison to the Ad-prosthesis Modum System Novum or fixed prostheses, overdentures have improved aesthetics, because they have no sides and allow the exposure of any margin money.
Phonetics: the absence of pocket, can not escape the characteristic whistling in other prosthetic implant.
Hygienic: For those cases that require easier access to oral hygiene, such as in elderly patients with mobility problems.
Malformations: A misaligned skeletal sometimes makes it difficult to make a fixed restoration.
No integration of some implants: In the case of some non-bony implants, it does not allow the realization of a fixed prosthesis, it is advisable to make an Overdenture.

 

Contraindications for an Overdenture are:
Patients' psicolábiles that have applied for fixed and not to accept a removable prosthesis.
Patients with a mandibular alveolar atrophy so advanced that the tooth nerve is very close to the alveolar crest.
Patients who do not tolerate food impaction under the denture.
Within systems Anchorages for restraint or overdentures are the following:
Bars
Spheres or balls
Magnets and Magnetic Systems
1. Rods: The rods are those that offer greater predictability to our treatment should be first choice for overdentures. In conducting bars must abide by certain rules, such as:
a) parallel to the intercondylar axis, this will ensure the application of vertical forces to the implant and reduce the occurrence of lateral forces by decomposing them into the movement of the prosthesis. (4) (Fig. 1)

 

Fig 1. The bar should be parallel to the intercondylar axis

 

Therefore we must do our articulator mounting with exact location of the hinge axis. A second way to ensure its guidance is that the bar is perpendicular to the bisector of the angle formed by lines passing through the upper edges of the bone, arising from the papilla retromolares. (Fig. 2)

 

Fig 2. Angle bisector

 

b) bar and line extensions: Being straight avoiding the presence of rotational moments on implants. Has been studied using the "finite element" that can be as harmful, in terms of overloading of the implant, the lateral extensions of the superstructure, leading in general to a marginal bone resorption. (Figs. 3 and 4)

 

 

 

Fig 3. Hader Bar

 

Fig 4. Hader bar and welded to cast pillars U.C.L.A.

 

This bar (Dolder or Ackerman) can be round or ovoid, welded to the cylinders of gold, only to be bolted to the pillars. (Fig. 5)

 

5: Dolder bar

 

c) participating in the bar and not in the retention bracket. We must achieve a suitable technique for printing functional, as if it were a conventional full dentures, where support is given by the mucous membranes in office. It is advisable also to leave a space between the bar and the soft tissue to the patient to access their health. (Fig. 6)

 

 

Fig 6. Biomechanical principles of the bar.

 

The parallelism should be respected for that rotate on the bar overdentures (hinge effect) when the jaws come into occlusion. In this way we will have only vertical forces on the implant and avoid lateral forces.

d) Length of the bar between 18 and 23 mm. ie, a separation of the implants between 22 and 27 mm., which corresponds approximately in the area of the canines. Require a greater distance to a curved bar. By reducing the distance, however, the implants were biomechanically behave as one, which determines a marginal reduction in the appearance of lateral forces.

e) The "clip" of retention, may be metal or plastic. The metal clip you can go off in time, which sometimes can be corrected, making a new prosthesis. Furthermore, the plastic clip, it is easier to change, with the advantage of being cheaper (2).
2. Balls: Attachments ball type ( "O-ring") offer a quick and practical solution to our rehabilitation. Most of the commercial houses that offer different types need only be "bolted" on the implant. Unfortunately, the simplicity of this solution results in the long run into trouble in the implant.

 

Fig 7. Pillars O `rings.

 

This type of attachment tends to have, despite the spacers, lateral and torsional forces on the implant. This will result in a marginal bone resorption with consequent loss of the implant, even if it is a bone of poor quality, very frequent in the maxilla. This should make us meditate before using this type of retention, reserved only for cases where only one exists, or where the patient's oral anatomy or the location of the implants to prevent us from using a bar. (2)


3. Magnets: The magnets are acceptable biomechanical behavior (Fig. 8), which do not transmit large lateral forces, giving good retention. The problem with this type of attachment is that the years have lost more than 50% retention, because the magnets suffer corrosion when exposed to a wet, especially the oral, almost a "zero restraint" to few years of use. This is the main cause of failure of the restraint magnetic. (2)

 

Fig 8. Open-field magnet. Pole adjacent to the sensor does not generate a magnetic field which spreads in all directions.

 

As solution is useful, but should be monitored and changed periodically. On this alternative, still in the air the following questions: Can the magnet with its magnetic fields affect osseointegration? Will it affect our corrosion implant? Nothing yet has been published.

With respect to the occlusion to be presenting this type of rehabilitation, there is total agreement among the authors: "occlusion bilateral balanced with freedom in centric". In this way we ensure a stable, which favors the use of biomechanically prosthetic device. These patients should be subjected, after the treatment, a thorough periodic inspection, to be evaluating each of the prosthetic components. They should be instructed in the techniques of oral hygiene. This is very important to prevent inflammation of the gingiva or peri-emergence of the hyperplastic gingiva. It is undoubtedly the use of overdentures in implant prosthetic excellent long-term solution, to our patients. (5)


Case Report

Male 68 years old.
Carrier removable upper and lower dentures
Edente upper part
Edente remaining lower part # 33
Expresses disagreement in his lower dentures
Treatment: Placement of 2 implants in the area of parts # 33 and 43
(3.75 x 4 x 13mm and 13mm, respectively) for the establishment of a system using bar overdentures Hader.

 

9. Panoramic radiograph and the placement of stickers for the study of pre-surgical implants.

 

Fig 10. Removal of item # 33. Supracrestal linear incision with medial and horizontal liberatrices towards distal. Mucoperiosteal flap lifting.

 

Fig 11. Placement of the implant mechanically with strawberry Stargrip (micro) zone Part # 43.

 

Fig 12. Panoramic x-ray control

 

Fig 13. Suture for two-stage procedure

 

Fig 14. Three months after placement of implants

 

Fig 15. Attaching healing pillars which remain for two weeks.

 

Fig 16. Placing square cap transfers, which were acrylic ferulizadas with low polymerization shrinkage.

 

Fig 17. Initial printing for the manufacture of the bar

 

Fig 18. Impeller nut height. Registration takes place and takes up the vertical dimension of the patient

 

Fig 19. Hader bar kit which contains two bars Hader calcined (green), two (yellow), horses (golden color) and standard clips (yellow).

 

Fig 20. Location of the two pillars U.C.L.A. burnt plastic on the plaster model and the bar to be cast with two clips mounted on two horses.

 

Fig 21. Evidence of the bar and making a second printing directly from the bar, which placed two screws interns. After this is done the joint prosthesis and dental acrylic final.

 

Fig 22. The bar is screwed and torquea to 32 Ncm each pillar UCLA Gutta-percha is placed in the inlets to the screws.

 

Fig 23. Overdentures and partial dentures superior inferior.

 

Fig 24. Noble part of the prosthesis than with horses and plastic clips which grasp the bar that is screwed in the mouth.

 

Conclusions:

Systems with overdentures Osseointegrated implants have their indications and contraindications. Present different types of anchors, of which the highlight bar systems, their advantages and disadvantages.

Another important point is to educate our patients with hygiene standards to be met in the care of the bar and make them aware of the periodic inspections to be undertaken to achieve maintain health in the tissues Periimplant.

Following strict protocols for the preparation of the overdentures, and without neglecting their maintenance, get the best results you want.


Acknowledgments:

Dr. Jose Valdivia, Juan Carlos López and Dr. Juan Pablo Parrochia, who introduced me into the world of Rehabilitation on Dental Implants.
Dr. Hector Norero, Dr. Jaime Acuña et al. And taught me the surgical techniques in Oral Implantology.
My wife for their help and constructive criticism in reviewing this work.


Bibliography

1. J. Cicero; Daudt W. Overdenture (overdentures). Osseointegrated Implant Surgery and Prosthetics. 11: 179 - 202. 2003

2. Riveros N. E. Ramirez Indication and Planning overdentures on osseointegrated implants. Dental Information Portal on the Internet. http://www.dentalcolombia.com/docs/implantes/protesis/integra2.htm

3. F. Todesco, A. Bechelli, H. Romanelli: Total toothless upper and lower. Contemporary Implant Surgery and Prosthodontics. 17: 393-413. 2005.

4. Barrientos M. Removable prostheses and implants in the elderly. Journal of Dental Technology. 71-79. 2002.

5. Pozo C. Osseointegrated implants in overdentures. Journal of Dental Technology: 91-94. 2002.

 

Autor:

 

DIRECTORY OF DENTIST IN ECUADOR

Maxillofacial Surgeons

Dentists Neurofocales  

Endodontists (Dental pain)

Pediatric

Implant

Orthodontists

General Dentists

Oral rehabilitation

 

Directory of Dentists   │   Directory of Clinics │ Articles to Patients   │   Articles to Dentists │ Advertise HERE
 

Dentistry Magazines   │   Online Consultations

 

Guayaquil Ecuador

 

Copyright © 2000 - 2011
Prohibited its total or partial reproduction without written permission.